(CNN) — Malawi’s decision to reject pop star Madonna’s adoption of a local child has reignited global debate about the ethics of international adoption. Some international aid groups have praised the decision as best for the child, a 4-year-old girl named Chifundo James. “I think it really highlights the bigger picture that there are so many children living in poverty in Malawi, and while Madonna has good intentions … children would be better off staying in their own communities whenever possible,” said Karen Hansen-Kuhn, policy director for ActionAid USA.
To get another perspective on the situation, CNN talked with Melissa Fay Greene.
CNN: What’s your initial reaction to the news that Madonna’s adoption of a Malawian child has been rejected?
Greene: Surprise. … It was awfully tricky with Madonna’s first adoption, when the child turned out to have devoted family members nearby. [The singer’s adoption of a Malawian boy was finalized last year.] And if that’s true with this child also, it seems a similar sticky situation. That’s not the situation for the majority of orphanage children around the world, who don’t have caring grandparents or aunts and uncles a short walk or bike ride away.
It gives people an odd perspective on what international adoption can mean for children who don’t have any support network outside the walls of an orphanage.
You often hear attacks on international adoption as robbing a child of his or her culture, and that’s both true and false. It’s true that an internationally adopted child loses the rich background of history and religion and culture and language that the child was born into, but the cruel fact is that most children don’t have access to that local beautiful culture from within an orphanage. …
There’s an orphanage culture that children are eager to escape from, and it’s a culture of being reared as a group and not being doted upon by parents. For any child, that’s the bottom line, the need for parents. And there’s no way an institutional setting can give a baby what the baby needs. It’s impossible. So you have to balance priorities. …
The human rights groups are accurate: international adoption does not begin to solve the problems of the world’s orphaned children. It’s truly not the answer. …
At the same time, international adoption, even though it doesn’t solve the whole problem, it solves a problem for a few. It is a brilliant solution to the problem of adults wanting a child or more children in their lives and the problem of children who want parents in their lives.
CNN:How is it different for a celebrity person seeking an [international] adoption than for yourself?
Greene: We don’t jet in, take a child and fly out with a child. For an average citizen trying to adopt, it takes most of a year. First of all, you work with a country that already has international adoption regulations in place, so you have a bureaucracy dealing with international adoption. The local government will determine whether a child is a true orphan, and whether or not there is any family member able to care for the child. In our children’s adoptions, people appeared in court to testify that there was no one to take the children. So you don’t run the risk of ‘Oh, whoops, there’s a grandmother down the street.’ …
CNN: There’s been some chatter today online questioning why a person wouldn’t adopt an orphaned child from their own country.
Greene: Within the adoption world, it’s a non-issue. There are children all over the world who need families, and some find their children in Philadelphia, and some find their children in Bulgaria, you know? …
It’s just outsiders who look on and judge disapprovingly, but then they don’t go on to adopt the neighborhood children, right? … There are many children who need help, and anyone who wants to reach out and adopt a child from foster care or from a Russian orphanage should reach out and do it…
CNN: The first time you adopted internationally, can you tell me what your ethical considerations were and how you worked through that personally?
Greene: Our first adoption was of a boy in rural Bulgaria. An incredibly poor orphanage. The kids were hungry, thirsty, no education. I first met our son, Jesse, when he was 4. He was 4 years old, and he did not know what his own name was …
When he first came, he was just so anxious about food. When he would wake up, he was just shaking, wondering if there was going to be enough food. So I started waking him up with food.
He had issues with water. He wasn’t sure if there was going to be enough water to drink, so I bought him a little canteen so he could wear his water all of the time.
Do I have ethical issues about taking him out of that orphanage? I don’t.
CNN: Is there anything else you wanted to add?
Greene: I admire Madonna. And I don’t understand why everyone attacks Madonna. I think that she is in part trying to raise the world’s consciousness about the African orphan crisis.
Ninety-five percent of the children orphaned by AIDS [globally] are in sub-Saharan Africa. You don’t hear world leaders talking about it. Where is the global outrage? …
So, into the breach steps a celebrity. But don’t attack her for it. Maybe her methods are not what ours would be, but how many of us are Madonna? But at least she is out there; she’s creating schools.
Obviously, she’s fallen in love with the Malawian children to such an extent she wants to make some of them her own. And I think that it’s great. I just don’t understand why the world’s attacking her. Let other people step forth and do something. At least she’s trying. That’s my feeling.
Meredith says
Melissa, I agree with you on Madonna’s adoption! I remember reading it in a magazine and I was mortified to see that so many people were attacking her for doing a humble act. Adopting a child from another country is the most difficult decision to make, but it isn’t a wrong decision. It’s the right decision! I love Madonna for taking on the responsiblity to nuture this young boy and bring him to a place where he wouldn’t have to worry about anything. Thanks for supporting Madonna! 🙂
carrie says
Thank you so much for supporting Madonna. So many people just want to tear her down and attack her for doing something good. (Also Angelina Jolie.) When the children she has adopted grow up, I am sure they will be glad that they were able to have a family and everything else they needed. She also has the resources to keep them connected with their birth family if that is desired, which most people may not. And she has done that. While her adopted son, David, did have loving family members, he was still living in an orphanage. Every child should have at least one adult to love them and protect them. For all the people that attack Madonna and Angelina, I wonder what they are doing to help children in need.